" />


Oct
14
2005

Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine issues co-sleeping and breastfeeding guidelines

Contrary to even the recommendations of its own section on breastfeeding, the (AAP) released an statement from its Task Force on SIDS1 (sudden infant death syndrome) the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine has problems accepting.

Recommendations that advise against parent-infant bed-sharing and support the generic use of pacifiers imply a "truly astounding triumph of ethnocentric assumptions over commonsense and medical research," according to Nancy Wight, M.D., president of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine.

These issues will be addressed in the new peer-reviewed journal , the journal of the .

Current research from the CDC2, as well as AAP’s existing policy statement on Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk3, note breastfeeding is associated with a lower risk of SIDS.

Since 1992, SIDS has decreased as both co-sleeping and breastfeeding have increased. Sleeping near one’s baby or in the same room has been shown to reduce the risks of SIDS and more broadly promote maternal and child health by facilitating breastfeeding.

As exclusively breastfed infants feed frequently through the night, breastfeeding is thought to reduce SIDS by the same proposed mechanism as supine sleep and pacifiers, namely less deep sleep and frequent brief awakenings.

Breastfed babies do not need artificial pacifiers to get stimulation since they already have the protective effect of suckling during the night. Pacifiers have been associated with increased risk of ear infections, later dental problems, and reduced breastfeeding.

As reduced breastfeeding increases infant mortality from infectious disease and several other causes, the ABM agrees with the AAP that a pacifier should not be introduced until breastfeeding is well established and never forced on an infant.

Pacifiers would only be of possible benefit to infants lacking the natural opportunity of breastfeeding.

Extensive research on infant sleep has revealed that infants are frequently aroused to lighter stages of sleep by parental movement when co-sleeping.

Dr. James J. McKenna, of the University of Notre Dame, was a consultant to the AAP on the new policy, but disagrees strongly with their conclusions.4 He points out there are many forms of co-sleeping, and that recommendations for safe co-sleeping need to be publicized.

Co-sleeping is defined as sleeping in close proximity to one’s infant, which can include but does not necessarily imply being in the same bed.

Infants should never co-sleep with other siblings, with smoking or substance-abusing parents, on sofas or waterbeds, with soft bedding materials, or adjacent to spaces that could trap the infant.

As with sleeping in a crib, infants should be placed on their backs, with only a thin blanket on a firm bedding surface.

Evidence-based recommendations regarding co-sleeping and breastfeeding may be found in Protocol #6 on the ’s site.

Citations
    1. AAP Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. The Changing Concept of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Diagnostic Coding Shifts, Controversies Regarding Sleeping Environment, and New Variables to Consider in Reducing Risk. November 2005; 116(5):1245-1255
    2. American Academy of , Section on Breastfeeding, Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk. Pediatrics 2005; 115(2):496-506
    3. Chen A, Rogan WJ. Breastfeeding and the Risk of Post-neonatal Death in the United States. 2004; 113:e435-439 URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/113/5/e435
    4. McKenna JJ, McDade T. Why babies should never sleep alone: A Review of the co-sleeping controversy in relation to SIDS, bedsharing and breast feeding. 2005; 6:134-152
_____________
Tell A Friend
  1. (required)
  2. (valid email required)
  3. (required)
  4. (valid email required)
  5. Anti-SPAM Verification
  6. Captcha
  7. SmartBot Challenge
  8. Terms of Use
  9. By using Awake In America’s contact form, I certify I am not attempting to send SPAM to Awake In America; that I am not using this service to stalk, harass, violate any Orders of Protection, or other court-ordered restraints from abuse or harassment; that I am not attempting to create a denial-of-service, or any other malicious or unwanted events from the perspective of others. I understand Awake In America’s contact form is bound by this site’s Terms of Service, as well as other policies, published or non-published, and that any abuse may result in criminal or civil prosecution.
 

cforms contact form by delicious:days

_____________
/Sleep News — Infants & Sleep/co-sleeping-and-breastfeeding-guidelines-released/2005-10-14.1512

__________
Print Now! Print Now!   

If you liked this post, be sure to
subscribe to OUR RSS feed!

Previous post:

Next post:



Interesting Apnea Statistics
~~ Apnea in United States ~~

As of May 2, 2009 at 9:47 p.m. (-0500) (ET), the U.S. population
was 306,340,710. Sleep researchers estimate approximately seven percent
of the population suffers from obstructive sleep apnea. Using that
estimate, there are potentially 21,443,850 apneics in the U.S.

~~ Apnea around the world ~~

As of May 2, 2009 at 9:47 p.m. (-0500) (ET), the world population
was 6,777,286,604. Sleep researchers estimate approximately seven percent
of the population suffers from obstructive sleep apnea. Using that
estimate, there are potentially 474,410,062 apneics in the world.